2004 2/3 First half of course was well received, second half not as well received. This was also seen in 3/3.
2005 2/3 it was realized that the course was essentially a IS course with Com Sci content. As a result, the teaching of programming was moved from the lectures to the labs, while the lectures focused on IS. Due to the nature of assessment, there was also little feedback before the exam. Many students were learning the skills in order to complete the project as they went along.
2005 3/3 assessments marked in labs, more feedback on progress.
2006 2/3 Term project was broken into 4 parts, so students could receive regular feedback on their progress.
2006 3/3 In order to alleviate plagiarism issues with take home assignments, it was replaced with an in-class test. The relevant information for the test was given out two weeks prior.
No comments:
Post a Comment